1449: Thomas Massie – Big Government vs. Big Business

The big difference between big government and big business is big government can take you to jail, or shoot you if you don't comply. —Thomas Massie
Normal Quality (1920×1005 223 KB)
The big difference between big government and big business is big government can take you to jail, or shoot you if you don't comply. —Thomas Massie
Normal Quality (1920×1372 293 KB)
The big difference between big government and big business is big government can take you to jail, or shoot you if you don't comply. —Thomas Massie
The big difference between big government and big business is big government can take you to jail, or shoot you if you don't comply. —Thomas Massie

The big difference between big government and big business is big government can take you to jail, or shoot you if you don’t comply. —Thomas Massie

1448: Shane Hazel – I’m Very Pro-Life

Personally, I'm very pro-life, but I don't think it's a good idea to take money through force and coercion to fund things that are against people's conscience whether they're pro-life or pro-choice. —Shane Hazel
Normal Quality (1920×1005 220 KB)
Personally, I'm very pro-life, but I don't think it's a good idea to take money through force and coercion to fund things that are against people's conscience whether they're pro-life or pro-choice. —Shane Hazel
Normal Quality (1920×1372 274 KB)
Personally, I'm very pro-life, but I don't think it's a good idea to take money through force and coercion to fund things that are against people's conscience whether they're pro-life or pro-choice. —Shane Hazel
Personally, I'm very pro-life, but I don't think it's a good idea to take money through force and coercion to fund things that are against people's conscience whether they're pro-life or pro-choice. —Shane Hazel

Personally, I’m very pro-life, but I don’t think it’s a good idea to take money through force and coercion to fund things that are against people’s conscience whether they’re pro-life or pro-choice. —Shane Hazel

1444: Johnny Adams – Censorship is About Control

Censorship is really about the state being afraid of the ideas of liberty; they're afraid that it might catch on and that they will lose all control. —Johnny Adams
Normal Quality (1920×1005 318 KB)
Censorship is really about the state being afraid of the ideas of liberty; they're afraid that it might catch on and that they will lose all control. —Johnny Adams
Normal Quality (1920×1372 422 KB)
Censorship is really about the state being afraid of the ideas of liberty; they're afraid that it might catch on and that they will lose all control. —Johnny Adams
Censorship is really about the state being afraid of the ideas of liberty; they're afraid that it might catch on and that they will lose all control. —Johnny Adams

Censorship is really about the state being afraid of the ideas of liberty; they’re afraid that it might catch on and that they will lose all control. —Johnny Adams

1434: Walter Block – A Tax-Collecting Government

...to argue that a tax-collecting government can legitimately protect its citizens against aggression is to contradict oneself, since such an entity starts off the entire process by doing the very opposite of protecting those under its control. —Walter Block
Normal Quality (1920×1005 284 KB)
...to argue that a tax-collecting government can legitimately protect its citizens against aggression is to contradict oneself, since such an entity starts off the entire process by doing the very opposite of protecting those under its control. —Walter Block
Normal Quality (1920×1372 380 KB)
...to argue that a tax-collecting government can legitimately protect its citizens against aggression is to contradict oneself, since such an entity starts off the entire process by doing the very opposite of protecting those under its control. —Walter Block
...to argue that a tax-collecting government can legitimately protect its citizens against aggression is to contradict oneself, since such an entity starts off the entire process by doing the very opposite of protecting those under its control. —Walter Block

…to argue that a tax-collecting government can legitimately protect its citizens against aggression is to contradict oneself, since such an entity starts off the entire process by doing the very opposite of protecting those under its control. —Walter Block

1427: Lysander Spooner – Money in the Hands of Government

Every man who puts money into the hands of a "government," puts into its hands a sword which will be used against himself, to extort more money from him, and also to keep him in subjection to its arbitrary will. —Lysander Spooner
Normal Quality (1920×1005 198 KB)
Every man who puts money into the hands of a "government," puts into its hands a sword which will be used against himself, to extort more money from him, and also to keep him in subjection to its arbitrary will. —Lysander Spooner
Normal Quality (1920×1372 256 KB)
Every man who puts money into the hands of a "government," puts into its hands a sword which will be used against himself, to extort more money from him, and also to keep him in subjection to its arbitrary will. —Lysander Spooner
Every man who puts money into the hands of a "government," puts into its hands a sword which will be used against himself, to extort more money from him, and also to keep him in subjection to its arbitrary will. —Lysander Spooner

Every man who puts money into the hands of a “government,” puts into its hands a sword which will be used against himself, to extort more money from him, and also to keep him in subjection to its arbitrary will. —Lysander Spooner

1424: Antony Davies – About Unintended Consequences

The thing about unintended consequences is it doesn't matter whether your intent is good, it doesn't matter whether the regulation that you're imposing is well thought out, it doesn't matter whether lots of people are in favor of the regulation. It is the fact that the coercion takes away from people their abilities to make decisions for themselves that causes the unintended consequence. —Antony Davies
Download Print Quality (3840×2010 196 KB)  |  Normal Quality (3840×2010 108 KB)
The thing about unintended consequences is it doesn't matter whether your intent is good, it doesn't matter whether the regulation that you're imposing is well thought out, it doesn't matter whether lots of people are in favor of the regulation. It is the fact that the coercion takes away from people their abilities to make decisions for themselves that causes the unintended consequence. —Antony Davies
Download Print Quality (3840×3840 277 KB)  |  Normal Quality (3840×3840 144 KB)
The thing about unintended consequences is it doesn't matter whether your intent is good, it doesn't matter whether the regulation that you're imposing is well thought out, it doesn't matter whether lots of people are in favor of the regulation. It is the fact that the coercion takes away from people their abilities to make decisions for themselves that causes the unintended consequence. —Antony Davies
The thing about unintended consequences is it doesn't matter whether your intent is good, it doesn't matter whether the regulation that you're imposing is well thought out, it doesn't matter whether lots of people are in favor of the regulation. It is the fact that the coercion takes away from people their abilities to make decisions for themselves that causes the unintended consequence. —Antony Davies

The thing about unintended consequences is it doesn’t matter whether your intent is good, it doesn’t matter whether the regulation that you’re imposing is well thought out, it doesn’t matter whether lots of people are in favor of the regulation. It is the fact that the coercion takes away from people their abilities to make decisions for themselves that causes the unintended consequence. —Antony Davies

1423: Ludwig von Mises – Anarchism

Anarchism rejects all coercive social organizations, and repudiates coercion as a social technique. — Ludwig von Mises
Download Print Quality (3840×2010 239 KB)  |  Normal Quality (3840×2010 140 KB)
Anarchism rejects all coercive social organizations, and repudiates coercion as a social technique. — Ludwig von Mises
Download Print Quality (3073×3840 324 KB)  |  Normal Quality (3073×3840 185 KB)
Anarchism rejects all coercive social organizations, and repudiates coercion as a social technique. — Ludwig von Mises
Anarchism rejects all coercive social organizations, and repudiates coercion as a social technique. — Ludwig von Mises

People often fail to perceive the fundamental difference between the liberal and the anarchistic idea. Anarchism rejects all coercive social organizations, and repudiates coercion as a social technique. It wishes in fact to abolish the State and the legal order, because it believes that society could do better without them. It does not fear anarchical disorder because it believes that without compulsion men would unite for social co-operation and would behave in the manner that social life demands.

Anarchism as such is neither liberal nor socialistic: it moves on a different plane from either. Whoever denies the basic idea of Anarchism, whoever denies that it is or ever will be possible to unite men without coercion under a binding legal order for peaceful co-operation, will, whether liberal or socialist, repudiate anarchistic ideals.

— Ludwig von Mises (Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis)

1421: Lysander Spooner – Government and the Robber

The robber does not pretend to be anything but a robber. Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do. He does not persist in following you on the road, against your will; assuming to be your rightful "sovereign," on account of the "protection" he affords you.

He does not keep "protecting" you, by commanding you to bow down and serve him; by requiring you to do this, and forbidding you to do that; by robbing you of more money as often as he finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so; and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor, and an enemy to your country, and shooting you down without mercy, if you dispute his authority, or resist his demands. —Lysander Spooner
Download Print Quality (3840×2010 222 KB)  |  Normal Quality (3840×2010 125 KB)
The robber does not pretend to be anything but a robber. Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do. He does not persist in following you on the road, against your will; assuming to be your rightful "sovereign," on account of the "protection" he affords you.

He does not keep "protecting" you, by commanding you to bow down and serve him; by requiring you to do this, and forbidding you to do that; by robbing you of more money as often as he finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so; and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor, and an enemy to your country, and shooting you down without mercy, if you dispute his authority, or resist his demands. —Lysander Spooner
Download Print Quality (3073×3840 293 KB)  |  Normal Quality (3073×3840 162 KB)
The robber does not pretend to be anything but a robber. Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do. He does not persist in following you on the road, against your will; assuming to be your rightful "sovereign," on account of the "protection" he affords you.

He does not keep "protecting" you, by commanding you to bow down and serve him; by requiring you to do this, and forbidding you to do that; by robbing you of more money as often as he finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so; and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor, and an enemy to your country, and shooting you down without mercy, if you dispute his authority, or resist his demands. —Lysander Spooner
The robber does not pretend to be anything but a robber. Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do. He does not persist in following you on the road, against your will; assuming to be your rightful "sovereign," on account of the "protection" he affords you.

He does not keep "protecting" you, by commanding you to bow down and serve him; by requiring you to do this, and forbidding you to do that; by robbing you of more money as often as he finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so; and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor, and an enemy to your country, and shooting you down without mercy, if you dispute his authority, or resist his demands. —Lysander Spooner

The robber does not pretend to be anything but a robber. Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do. He does not persist in following you on the road, against your will; assuming to be your rightful “sovereign,” on account of the “protection” he affords you.

He does not keep “protecting” you, by commanding you to bow down and serve him; by requiring you to do this, and forbidding you to do that; by robbing you of more money as often as he finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so; and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor, and an enemy to your country, and shooting you down without mercy, if you dispute his authority, or resist his demands. —Lysander Spooner

1414: Mindy Robinson – Safe and Effective

They censored us, banned us, and flagged every single post. They claimed it was “safe and effective,” but we were right about it not working or being safe the entire damn time. —Mindy Robinson
Normal Quality (1920×1005 251 KB)
They censored us, banned us, and flagged every single post. They claimed it was “safe and effective,” but we were right about it not working or being safe the entire damn time. —Mindy Robinson
Normal Quality (1920×1372 325 KB)
They censored us, banned us, and flagged every single post. They claimed it was “safe and effective,” but we were right about it not working or being safe the entire damn time. —Mindy Robinson
They censored us, banned us, and flagged every single post. They claimed it was “safe and effective,” but we were right about it not working or being safe the entire damn time. —Mindy Robinson

They censored us, banned us, and flagged every single post. They claimed it was “safe and effective,” but we were right about it not working or being safe the entire damn time. —Mindy Robinson

1411: Jack Lloyd – Voting and Individual Consent

Voting cannot be a substitute for individual consent, as voting is forced upon all people whether they agree with having a vote in the first place or not. —Jack Lloyd, The Definitive Guide to Libertarian Voluntaryism
Normal Quality (1920×1005 247 KB)
Voting cannot be a substitute for individual consent, as voting is forced upon all people whether they agree with having a vote in the first place or not. —Jack Lloyd, The Definitive Guide to Libertarian Voluntaryism
Normal Quality (1920×1372 320 KB)
Voting cannot be a substitute for individual consent, as voting is forced upon all people whether they agree with having a vote in the first place or not. —Jack Lloyd, The Definitive Guide to Libertarian Voluntaryism
Voting cannot be a substitute for individual consent, as voting is forced upon all people whether they agree with having a vote in the first place or not. —Jack Lloyd, The Definitive Guide to Libertarian Voluntaryism

Voting cannot be a substitute for individual consent, as voting is forced upon all people whether they agree with having a vote in the first place or not. —Jack Lloyd, The Definitive Guide to Libertarian Voluntaryism